PHYS THER
Vol. 90, No. 1, January 2010, pp. 55-66
DOI: 10.2522/ptj.20090140

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
ptj.20090140v1
90/1/55    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Rapid Responses are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kesar, T. M.
Right arrow Articles by Binder-Macleod, S. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kesar, T. M.
Right arrow Articles by Binder-Macleod, S. A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Electrotherapy
Right arrow Gait Disorders
Right arrow Kinesiology/Biomechanics
Right arrow Injuries and Conditions: Ankle
Right arrow Injuries and Conditions: Foot
Right arrow Stroke (Neurology)
Right arrow Stroke (Geriatrics)
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Research Reports

Novel Patterns of Functional Electrical Stimulation Have an Immediate Effect on Dorsiflexor Muscle Function During Gait for People Poststroke

Trisha M. Kesar, Ramu Perumal, Angela Jancosko, Darcy S. Reisman, Katherine S. Rudolph, Jill S. Higginson and Stuart A. Binder-Macleod

T.M. Kesar, PT, PhD, is Post-Doctoral Researcher, Department of Physical Therapy, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware. She was a doctoral student in the Biomechanics and Movement Science Program, University of Delaware, during the completion of this study.
R. Perumal, PhD, is Research Scientist, Department of Physical Therapy, University of Delaware.
A. Jancosko, PT, NCS, is Physical Therapist, Magee Rehabilitation Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
D.S. Reisman, PT, PhD, is Assistant Professor, Department of Physical Therapy, University of Delaware.
K.S. Rudolph, PT, PhD, is Associate Professor, Department of Physical Therapy, University of Delaware.
J.S. Higginson, PhD, is Assistant Professor, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Delaware.
S.A. Binder-Macleod, PT, PhD, FAPTA, is Edward L. Ratledge Professor and Chair, Department of Physical Therapy, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716 (USA).

Address all correspondence to Dr Binder-Macleod at: sbinder{at}udel.edu.

Background: Foot drop is a common gait impairment after stroke. Functional electrical stimulation (FES) of the ankle dorsiflexor muscles during the swing phase of gait can help correct foot drop. Compared with constant-frequency trains (CFTs), which typically are used during FES, novel stimulation patterns called variable-frequency trains (VFTs) have been shown to enhance isometric and nonisometric muscle performance. However, VFTs have never been used for FES during gait.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare knee and ankle kinematics during the swing phase of gait when FES was delivered to the ankle dorsiflexor muscles using VFTs versus CFTs.

Design: A repeated-measures design was used in this study.

Participants: Thirteen individuals with hemiparesis following stroke (9 men, 4 women; age=46–72 years) participated in the study.

Methods: Participants completed 20- to 40-second bouts of walking at their self-selected walking speeds. Three walking conditions were compared: walking without FES, walking with dorsiflexor muscle FES using CFTs, and walking with dorsiflexor FES using VFTs.

Results: Functional electrical stimulation using both CFTs and VFTs improved ankle dorsiflexion angles during the swing phase of gait compared with walking without FES (X±SE=–2.9°±1.2°). Greater ankle dorsiflexion in the swing phase was generated during walking with FES using VFTs (X±SE=2.1°±1.5°) versus CFTs (X±SE=0.3±1.3°). Surprisingly, dorsiflexor FES resulted in reduced knee flexion during the swing phase and reduced ankle plantar flexion at toe-off.

Conclusions: The findings suggest that novel FES systems capable of delivering VFTs during gait can produce enhanced correction of foot drop compared with traditional FES systems that deliver CFTs. The results also suggest that the timing of delivery of FES during gait is critical and merits further investigation.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
R. Perumal, A. S. Wexler, T. M. Kesar, A. Jancosko, Y. Laufer, and S. A. Binder-Macleod
A phenomenological model that predicts forces generated when electrical stimulation is superimposed on submaximal volitional contractions
J Appl Physiol, June 1, 2010; 108(6): 1595 - 1604.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]